The Human Experience
Transcript for Episode 45 – Dean Radin PhD
welcome to the human experience podcast
the only podcast designed to fuse your
left and right brain hemispheres and
feed it the most entertaining and
mentally engaging topics on the planet
as we approach our ascent
please make sure your frontal temporal
and occipital lobes are in their full
upright position as you take your seat
consciousness relax your senses and
allow us to take you on a chip
we are the intimate strangers thank you
for listening this episode of the human
experience is brought to you by the Ru
veda health retreat in Alachua Florida
at har the ancient healing methods of ru
Veda yoga and meditation are used to
heal and restore balance internally and
externally bringing more peace happiness
and physical health within their guests
are you made a health retreat is a home
away from home where you will be
embraced with love and mindfulness
everything from the environment personal
interaction gourmet are you Vedic meals
and treatments are intentionally planned
to aid and support the healing of you
their guests they offer an 18 day
intensive yoga veda school if you travel
more than 500 miles you get $200 off
mention the human experience and they
will give you some extra love please get
to Arya Veda health retreat calm for any
questions more information and to book
your stay today
what’s up folks wow it feels like it has
been a thousand years since we’ve done
one of these episodes I take full
responsibility for that I have been
completely slammed had a family member
in the hospital and that has taken up
all of my time so my dearest apologies
for all of you out there that have been
looking for episodes from us it
admittedly feels great to be back behind
a microphone so we will do our best to
make sure that we get more episodes out
for you guys this year I got a bunch of
emails and messages thank you for those
this was a great episode we had such an
amazing time with dr. Raiden his words
have a very specific potency a huge
thanks to dr. Raiden for lending us his
time and doing this interview also big
thanks to my good friend Misha for
helping me co-host this episode dr.
Wheaton is a big hero of his so I hope
you guys enjoy this please make sure you
give our Facebook page and like
subscribe to our YouTube channel follow
us on Twitter and if you have any
feedback or just want to shoot me an
email I welcome those thank you guys so
much for listening
the human experience is traversing the
realms of parapsychology as we welcome
my guest dr. Dean Radin my good friend
Misha from the near-death experience
Research Foundation whose background is
in microbiology is going to be helping
co-host for the show
dr. Raiden my good sir welcome to hxp
thank you very much glad to be here so
dr. Raiden I mean your your online
biographies says that you were first
interested in psychic abilities at the
age of 12 you’ve written three books
over 200 articles and you’ve done
countless lectures and how how did this
work start for you well I think like a
lot of children who start reading fairy
tales and science fiction as soon as
they discover books that I immediately
was wondering as a child what of this is
pure fantasy and what of this might be
true and of course children don’t have a
very good way to discriminate from one
to the other when one topic to the next
and of course then you go to high school
you go to college and Beyond and you
learn very rapidly that there are
certain topics that are taken seriously
and others are dismissed so throughout
my whole college career in graduate
school and beyond I never heard anything
mentioned about psychic or mystical
experience within a scholarly tradition
now that’s partially because I was going
through engineering and going through
psychology curricula and so that these
topics wouldn’t necessarily come up but
on the other hand our entertainment
industry was saturated with it and I was
thought that it was a little odd that
experiences that people report
throughout history and in all cultures
and even today many scientists report
psychic experiences why isn’t this
discussed so I started looking into it
in a more serious way in terms of the
science when I was in graduate school
and I was surprised to read that there
always been for about a hundred and
thirty years a small group of scientists
and in all countries who have been in
applying the best methods of the day to
test whether in principle some of the
experiences that people report or that
are reported in legends could they have
any credence to them at all and I was
surprised I was surprised to find that
there is such a literature and I started
to do experiments as I had read and to
my surprise I was able to repeat some of
the things that I had read about and
that that basically hooked me because
it’s almost like there’s a secret in
plain sight there’s something of very
high interest that should be of high
interest to scientists but that the the
way science has developed you’re simply
not allowed to talk about it I thought
that was just odd
yeah I mean um you you have had quite
the career here I mean your your
experiments are quite far ranging how
many experiments do you think you’ve
done through your research oh that’s a
good question
actually I don’t have any idea come to
think of it a couple of dozen maybe some
more I don’t I don’t really know is
there anyone that is more remarkable for
you than the others well no I can’t say
that I’m blase about it at this point
because I’m continued to be interested
in the nature of these experiences and
what they might mean but I think every
time I plan an experiment run it and get
a significant outcome almost as
astonished as I was when it began and
it’s it’s partially because we science
in terms of theory has yet to catch up
with simply the empirical data there are
hints about how Theory might go but we
don’t have very good explanations yet so
one of the things that I’ve discovered
here is that people like myself who go
into this as empiricists have to have a
high tolerance for ambiguity and I have
a very high tolerance or not
and it doesn’t bother me but for a lot
of colleagues it does bother them a lot
that they don’t have a good explanation
and they don’t like it at all dr. Reid
and this is Misha here I think I’ve read
in some of your works that like you said
you’re not blase but you’ve sort of
moved on from wondering if the
paranormal is real or sigh effects are
real you’ve maybe moved on from that to
really wondering what the mechanism is
and I can completely identify with that
as a scientist but maybe for the
listeners I was wondering you know what
is the most amazing thing you’ve seen is
there some moment where you go where you
were in your career looking at some data
or something like that and you said oh
my gosh I just I just can’t believe this
but it really is real that that moment
when it clicked for you you know because
you’ve mentioned some interest in your
childhood but as you you know get a
university degree and so forth you you
learn other tools to look at problems
more precisely and well I’m rambling but
I’m wondering what is one of those
moments for you well it’s actually a
very good question because you could
just by reading the literature come to
accept that these phenomena are real you
would probably reach the conclusion that
they’re in the general population we’re
talking about fairly weak effects and
the best analogy I can think of is if
you described to somebody how to play
golf and they had never actually done it
before you give them a club and you give
them a ball and you explain what to do
I’m probably not going to do very well
because they either don’t have the
talent and they haven’t practiced so the
same is true for the vast majority of
science we’re giving people who don’t
claim any special abilities that may or
may not have any experience with it an
artificial task that they have to do in
a certain way right now right in front
of us and even under those conditions
you get people who can do things so that
data alone for a lot of scientists who
haven’t worked with exceptional subjects
I can see how they would
would be interested but not really
convinced and that’s where I was up
until 1985 because I was getting results
but not spectacular but enough to keep
my interest so what convinced me was
when I was recruited for what is now
known as the Stargate program the US
government’s secret at the time a
research program and I got the
top-secret briefing this is what they
would tell to people who are read on to
the project and just from the the slides
I remember I was blown away because I
was seeing what at the time were highly
classified examples of remote viewing
many of those are now public domain so
that was part of it and I was thinking
Holy Smoke this this is the kind of
thing that is being briefed at the top
echelon of government and the military
with some details that are not yet
public like these are real missions
these are practical applications but
really cemented it for me was meeting
the people the remote viewers who had
done those tasks and watching them do it
in person the briefing is one thing but
watching it happen as it happens as
another thing that’s what convinced me
that not only is it real but it is
extremely odd in the sense that at the
time is that 1985 when when I was on
that program at the time the the
prevailing opinion within the scientific
community is that this stuff simply is
impossible it does not exist and yet so
from outside the building we’re working
in a realm where nobody believes it
inside the building it’s taken for
granted and we’re trying to push hard
and trying to understand what’s going on
and so in retrospect it actually made a
lot of sense and a point of view of
working on a secret program you don’t
want people to know that this is
possible because it it reduces the
effectiveness of the method as a tool
now that it is public domain of course
remote viewing is sometimes vastly
embellished beyond what it actually can
do but at least a lot of people have a
sense because they’ve
taking training courses here and there
that this is a real phenomenon in some
cases for talented people it could be
used for practical things but to make a
long story short the thing that really
convinced me was seeing very high level
of performance in a in a condition where
there was high credibility that this
would real yeah in terms of remote
viewing I know that major ed Dame’s has
made predictions that Obama will be the
last US president and elections will be
canceled and so forth I think he’s even
said that a group of remote viewers came
to sort of a consensus about that so if
there’s going to be another election I
want to hold his feet to the fire on
that but since you brought up remote
viewing you know many of the world’s
teachers talk about love being the
fabric of the universe and if love is
the foundation of let’s say some kind of
information field or something that
might be involved with SIA bilities then
is there any sort of morality to sigh
for example if someone used remote
viewing to help a loved one would that
work when maybe trying to use remote
viewing to kill someone would fail is
there any sort of you know difference in
that regard I don’t think so
I think we’re talking about a natural
phenomena which is simply wrapped into
the fabric of reality the way that we
use it is up to each individual and you
see this and you look in in almost every
spiritual tradition there are warnings
and cautions about how much your ego is
involved in this
so in story form the only difference
between a Jedi Knight and Darth Vader is
whether the ego gets inflamed it’s the
falling to the dark side but the same
skills are there and I think that is
probably the case dr. rignot
you know I I find this the this very
intriguing and I’d like to talk more
about what you saw during this this
top-secret experiment more of it later
but do you feel like this is part R of
our
evolutionary biology is this where the
next level of human is is headed by sort
of understanding this using it I think
it’s actually been around from the very
beginning in other words we’re not
creating magic along the way we’re not
making some something new if anything
weird evolving away from what used to be
a natural phenomenon or more readily
available phenomenon a case can be made
for example that the frontal lobes get
in the way of most psychic experience
and the evidence for that includes
things like looking at the neuroscience
of meditation where you find that very
advanced meditators show and hibbett
inhibition of the frontal lobes and they
also show a higher degree of spontaneous
psychic experience and mystical
experience the other thing is that a lot
of the training involved in various
forms of psychic effects is getting the
analytical side of the brain out of the
way and of course if you can do that
with the frontal lobes you find a way of
inhibiting it through stimulation
through meditation or whatever order
certain psychedelics you people
invariably get better so from that
perspective then I see an evolutionary
push is to maintain the ability of an
organism to survive and if you have the
capacity to pay attention to what’s
happening on Pluto you may miss the
tiger in front of you so think about a
couple million years of evolution that
will constrain human beings to get
closer and closer to attention on here
and now as opposed to there and then and
the more you do that the less and less
capable we are of paying attention to
things far away which is the essence of
psychic phenomena you know the reason
the reason I appreciate your answer and
the reason that I ask is because I
wonder for the people listening how does
this a
affect a person in their everyday
existence I mean how does being able to
affect the consequence of a random
number generator you know how does that
affect me how I mean how can i how can I
use this for my benefit in my everyday
life most of us don’t need these
abilities for everyday life at least
most of us who live and work in a
Western world where many of the things
that used to kill us pretty readily
don’t do that anymore
because it’s relatively safe if you live
in a war zone or you live in a place
with enormous amounts of uncertainty
then it can be useful because you get a
you can get a glimpse of what’s about to
happen so in thinking about the
experiments like random number
generators and the ganzfeld telepathy
experiment and all those sorts of things
all of those are artificial constructs
they’re designed very specifically to
look for is this phenomena possible in
principle and as an artificial construct
as all experiments are it’s not really
designed to say well what can we use
this for we’re welcome what more can we
learn about the nature of ourselves
based on this kind of experiment there
are tools specific kinds of tools to
allow us to probe the nature of these
phenomena when it comes to what do we do
that that then we can talk insightly
different terms well we wouldn’t talk
about psychic phenomena but rather did
you ever have a gut feeling about
something that turned out to be true or
about a person or did you ever pick up
the phone and he knew who was calling
before he looked at caller ID and that
sort of thing so these are not typically
life-and-death instances but they’re the
reminders that the phenomena are always
there just to slightly below the level
of awareness for most people and the
folks that we call psychics or ones
where it’s not quite as deep in the
unconscious it’s more readily available
dr. Raiden Misha again you know you
about intuition and intuition is a
loaded word because it’s generally
understood to mean something that’s you
know helping you make good decisions or
have something supporting your growth if
you agree with that basic definition of
intuition have you ever had any amazing
things like you know don’t fly on 9/11
or something like that
well the conventional explanation for
intuition is forgotten knowledge like
you you learn something at some point
and then you don’t remember that you
know that and the classic case is a
fireman who just suddenly runs outside
of a burning building and doesn’t know
why but at that moment it crashes and so
the explanation for that is that the
firefighter after a wire while learns
and when you hear certain sounds and you
see the flames in a certain way that is
just that happens just before a building
collapses so their intuition and
training saved them more interesting a
case of course is when things happen
where you don’t have any expertise and
there’s no way to anticipate what’s
happening in which case maybe then it’s
precognition
so do I have personal examples of this
yes nothing quite as dramatic as that
but to give an example for me most of
these kinds of experiences occur in the
in dreams so one time I had a dream
where I was in a car accident and the
airbags inflated and there was a lot of
dust inside the car and broken glass and
things of that sort so I woke up in the
morning and was kind of disturbed by
this dream because it didn’t seem to
match anything I had seen during the day
or anything really and as a result I
decided I was gonna drive to work a way
that I knew was a little bit safer
because it had traffic lights and was
more controlled traffic pattern so I go
to I get up to one of the traffic lights
and I’m just sitting there waiting for
the light to turn and then bang I get
rear-ended by the car behind me well he
was texting and thought he saw the light
change and accelerated and rammed into
the back of my car
well this was an accident I’ve never had
an accident before this was not
something that I caused because I was
just sitting there and it wasn’t
anywhere near as bad as the dream was
the airbags didn’t inflate for example
but I found well that’s interesting
here’s something that never happened to
me before
the previous night had a dream which is
kind of like this involving a car in an
accident
it’s never happened before that never
happened since so it’s difficult to
assign chance probability for such an
event but this is from a skeptical
perspective you’d say well there’s seven
or eight billion people and there’s a
lot of Dreams every night and some of
them are going to come true all of which
is true that’s why we go to the
laboratory where we know exactly what a
chance outcome is and because of those
tests we know that in principle
occasionally you can have actual
information from a future event that
impinges on your present right yeah as
far as the firefighters you mentioned
the the the subtle clues like the
different sounds and everything else and
I guess I was more talking about an area
where the person would have no expertise
at all
but to change gears a little bit in the
historical literature mm-hmm gut feeling
or intuition has had well has been
associated with various body centers
heart stomach the gut etc regardless of
the location there always seems to have
been this respect for the mind and the
body do you have any thoughts about when
the body is trying to give information
and I know some of this relates to your
experiments with the skin conductivity
and so forth do you have any thoughts on
the body being psychic more so than the
the thinking and the brain being psychic
I think that the the body is probably
identical or almost identical to what we
normally think of as the unconscious
mind it’s all connected and maybe one of
the reasons why when there are
transplants that sometimes people take
on the characteristics of the
organ that was transplanted into them
it’s kind of a cellular memory so it’s
not clear to me then that just because
you have strange gut feelings that it’s
literally the belly brain that’s trying
to get your attention you have maybe
more that the belly brain and your
unconscious are one in the same thing
slightly different ways of expressing
itself we’re talking about it perhaps
but that that I don’t make a strong
distinction then between mind and body
in fact one of the ways you can see this
is and the the yogic tradition for
example that after a while you get
extremely good control over your
autonomic nervous system in which case
well how does that happen the whole
point of calling it autonomic is that
it’s supposedly automatic it doesn’t
need conscious control but we know with
biofeedback or meditation training you
can get incredible control all the way
down to the single cells in your body so
this is maybe a clue as to why advanced
practices like meditation that people
become or apparently become more
psychically attuned simply because they
can reach down deeper into the
unconscious because I think that’s where
the vast majority of this information is
lurking all the time hmm dr. Aden I mean
that’s an interesting threaded and I you
know I really want to bring up
technology’s effect on research and and
what you think about how the global
connectivity that we all have through
the internet and I mean how does that
affect these these abilities that we
have and this global consciousness and
being able to communicate almost
instantly with a person across the world
well in many ways technology is allowing
us to do what could only be done through
psychic means in the past so this is
even further reason why we don’t need to
express these abilities anymore you
don’t need clairvoyance if you have TV
and you don’t need to Leppa the– if you
have telephones and so on so from that
perspective you can you
imagine that and in the future all of
these phenomena will have some
technological underpinning to them but
of course be very different at that
point and what we’re talking about which
is purely mind based phenomena so you
may have seen in the news that Mark
Zuckerberg was talking about the future
of Facebook as being telepathy of course
what he means is brain based telepathy
brain computer interface work and that’s
probably feasible at some point that’ll
probably be it’ll be happening and
people then assume that the kind of work
that I’m doing is the same as that and
of course it isn’t it’s totally
different because if psy phenomena are
real it’s a strong argument that mind
and brain are not identical and of
course when neuroscience perspective
that’s that’s anathema and from a
neuroscience perspective the brain is
the mind I think that’s probably not the
case
there certainly are strong correlates
with mind like effects but I don’t think
they’re the same thing
in your experience do you feel that some
some people more than others have a
proclivity or genetic sort of advantage
in and have expressed stronger abilities
than then others have you have you ever
seen this oh absolutely
no there’s no doubt that the
distribution of talent in this domain is
probably normal in the same way that it
is for sports or musical talent some
people are simply more attuned to these
kinds of phenomena we know that it
correlates with schizotypy which is the
scale at one end you’re full-blown
schizophrenic and the other blunt other
end you’re completely not and also with
a personality trait of openness how open
are you to new experience and a number
of other traits as well so you if you
simply do surveys about people’s
professions people’s beliefs you very
quickly segregate
people in two types of people who have
these experiences and people who have
the experiences tend to do a lot better
in actual control tests than people who
don’t have the experiences so this is
not surprising to me at all given that
virtually anything you can think of that
humans do will eventually fall into a
normal curve so they’re they’re going to
be people at the far right of that curve
dr. Raiden I’m assuming that some of
these psy abilities can be trained which
one of them you know like I don’t know
seeing the future or reading other
people’s thoughts that’s I don’t know
all the terminology but which one do you
think would be the easiest to train for
somebody that depends on the person’s
talent if you start with zero talent
you’re never going to learn anything
start with some talent and it happens to
be along the lines of empathy for
example well maybe you’ll end up being a
little bit better at telepathy than you
might be a precognition if you find
somebody who’s really really lucky in
the casino well maybe they’re better at
precognition than telepathy and so on
it’s not clear to me that somebody’s
going to be the equivalent of a polymath
in this domain although I imagine there
there could be a small percentage of
highly talented people that might fit
that classification the other thing
about training though is that if you
imagine that we’re talking about a
normal curve then by analogy everyone
can learn to play golf a little bit but
not everyone’s going to become a pro and
not everybody’s going to win the
competitions either so you need both
high talent very high talent and a huge
amount of practice they actually get any
better I understand what you’re saying
but you know you mentioned being briefed
on a secret program and everything and
so that sort of implies that we all may
have abilities greater than we are aware
of and you know I know that you’re
familiar with Edgar Cayce and his ideas
about the Akashic record containing all
information and that people just need to
learn better how to tune into that non
information do you think he was ahead of
his time do you think that an
information field or maybe a universal
consciousness is behind these amazing
amazing people that sometimes show these
abilities in the lab and in in everyday
life well first of all on the secret
program there were a very limited number
of highly talented people so there was
no implication that this is a widespread
ability in terms of Edgar Cayce that was
easy for him to say that everyone has
this capability I don’t buy it
nobody has exceptional capability in all
domains no one so the underlying
question though is well where did these
exceptional people get the information
from and there you’ll probably get as
many different answers from the
individuals as you ask them they all
have different concepts as a general
overarching story it’s something like
the perennial philosophy that there
simply is that that we have the the
sense that we are separate objects that
space and time are not really the same
thing and it’s that matter and energy
are different and so on like a classical
physical perspective of the world
that’s what common sense tells us that’s
what the vast majority people accept
unquestioning you go into modern physics
and suddenly you start to see that all
of those assumptions are actually wrong
that we’re talking about relationships
between what looks like fundamental
effects we’re talking about the core
assumptions like reality locality and
causality none of which are true in
quantum mechanics and so a philosopher
would say that common sense leads to a
notion of naive reality you know we walk
around as of what we’re seeing is
literally all there is physics and
science have repeatedly told us that
that’s not all there is we’re seeing a
very thin slice of reality and the
deeper we go into the fundamentals the
stranger and stranger begins to look if
you go deep enough it begins to look
like it’s a holistic fully
interconnected something or other that
transcends space
time and so if human experience can can
kind of grasp that directly and maybe
there’s an Akashic record and maybe
there isn’t but at minimum it means that
some aspect of your experience can
access literally anything in space and
time well that’s what people talk about
when they mentioned psychic or mystical
experience the difference between the
two is that psychic experience is almost
as though you can tap into what is
actually already there you’re not going
anywhere to get it you are already
embedded and a completely holistic or if
you wish a holographic medium that
contains all information throughout
space and time and you pull that
information back and you experience it
as a sense whereas a mystical experience
is you don’t pull it apart you just feel
like you are the hologram you are the
matrix or though a holistic environment
and you get everything all at the same
time but then you can’t talk about it
because language fails at that level
that’s why mystical experience is
usually just called ineffable something
happened it transformed me but I can’t
talk about it so that that’s why I may
have gone beyond your original question
but that’s that’s the riff I usually
have on that topic I’m I’m really
thoroughly enjoying this conversation
and what we’re discussing doctor right
now I’d been sort of biting might I
really want to know more about this
secret project that you were working on
and you know how how did you sort of get
inducted into this group well first of
all there’s two parts to it people like
ed Dame’s and a number of other people
who are now known for a remote viewing
we’re part of the operational mission in
the in the US Army so they weren’t
concerned about research they were
getting tasks every day find out what’s
happening here and what’s going on there
and they didn’t have interest in or time
really to do research I was part of the
research program where we didn’t have
any operational day-to-day stuff to do
we were tasked with two things one was
whether this represents a threat to
national security like if this is the
real phenomena do we need to worry about
the Chinese or the Russians or somebody
else who might be using this is it a
threat the second part is if you think
that the phenomena is real how can you
enhance it what can we learn from it how
do we shield it how do we block it and
so on those kinds of things so as as far
as threat analysis we were pretty sure
during that time in 1980s that the
Russians at least at the time the Soviet
Union probably had a similar program
that we did maybe the Chinese too but we
didn’t know we did know through
defecting scientists and through
articles that have been retrieved that
the nature of the research was slightly
different than what we were up to but
that they didn’t know any more than we
did
so that was comforting we were convinced
by the data that there was a real
phenomena going on wasn’t as robust or
repeatable as we would have liked but
nevertheless it was real and it was
useful so we had very good reasons to
believe that the Russians and maybe some
other country has had a similar program
so 20 years later when there was a date
aunt not only between our two countries
but also between the two programs and it
turned out that indeed there was a
program in the Soviet Union which was
much much bigger than the one in the
United States so there’s a very good
recent book on this topic by EDA and a
few other authors it was the director of
the Stargate program for about ten years
and so he describes the US side and the
Russian side both sides of the Iron
Curtain at the time and what both sides
were doing and so what used to be
top-secret in the US and top-secret in
Russia are now both in the pages of this
book so what we don’t know still today
is what is happening in China
which is in probably India incident
number of other countries I do know that
other countries track research in this
area not so much because they’re
actively doing something but they’re
tracking it for the same reasons we did
back in the 1980s we want to see how it
looking at this as a kind of a
technology is there something to worry
about is somebody going to get way ahead
of what we understand and that kind of
thing so I know that that that kind of
survey is still going on dr. Raiden
since you mentioned different countries
one of the things I’ve noticed is that
people in different parts of the world
can recognize named differently for
example if you ask someone in the US
about Edgar Cayce they’ll know who that
is but if you asked them about vaanga
from Bulgaria or wolf messing from
Poland they have no idea who you’re
talking about I’m assuming you’ve heard
of those latter two names in your field
do you have any comments about the way
that people understand this phenomenon
between the countries and sort of the
superstars that seem to pop up from time
to time yeah well it makes sense that
there’s going to be cultural differences
and also in language differences as well
the the Russian side was always a lot
closer to what we would call shamanism
than in the u.s. the US has probably
more traditional religious notions about
these kinds of effects but there and of
course the the Far East as their own
versions of Qi Gong and prana and the
concepts like that so those put overlays
on the nature of the phenomena but when
you actually analyze what do you mean
what what what are you talking about in
terms of the experiences that people
talk about or feel they all fall into
basically the same kind of taxonomy and
you find that even if you go back into
the ancient yoga literature which is I’m
referring to my book supernormal
where I did this you find that people
were talking about these same phenomena
2,000 years ago and probably well before
that so
the basic phenomena are probably the
same they get described differently and
some distortions based on language and
the history of each individual culture
but I think they’re all the same hmm I’m
very intriguing I you know dr. Reid
night I find your answers very to the
point and you have very eloquent way of
explaining them you you say that
meditation is important to you and is
there a spiritual benefit in your
opinion to meditation or practicing
these abilities well let me back up to
the beginning of your question which is
why what should we do with this and so
imagine that you were to ask Benjamin
Franklin why are you falling out with
these with these little sparks and the
kite flying and all that what what are
you doing well the answer is he was
curious
hey here’s here’s something that looks
like a spark and maybe it’s related to
these bolts of lightning and this is the
essence of scientific exploration and
you don’t need a reason other than
curiosity Benjamin Franklin might have
been able to imagine that someday we’d
have multi gigawatt power grids around
the world but I doubt it you don’t need
to even look that that long ago two
people are developing the first
computers who are thinking that why
would anybody need more than a mainframe
for anything so we have very limited
foresight even in a realm where we’re
studying precognition it’s very
difficult to know eventually what this
is going to turn into the best we have
are stories that we hear about from from
science fiction and fairy tales but even
those are pretty well constrained you do
occasionally find a science fiction
story that correctly anticipates
something about future but most of the
time it’s future technology and so here
we’re talking about something which is
way more fundamental than simply a
technological advancement so for example
we go back to 1900
when Lord Kelvin otherwise known as Sir
William Thompson gave a talk to the
Royal Society about the state of physics
and he said more or less that the
physics is pretty well wrapped up except
for two clouds and by the two clouds
that he was talking about we’re saying
that thermodynamics looks like it
explains everything in the natural world
so if you’re thinking about going into
physics don’t even bother except for
these two things the ultraviolet
catastrophe and a luminous ether
those were the two unsolved mysteries
well one turned into relativity and the
other turned into quantum mechanics so
from 1900 to the beginning of the 21st
century that span of a hundred years if
you had talked to physicists at the
beginning of the 20th century they would
have no idea at all about what was about
to happen I mean they were in the midst
of the Industrial Age where everything
was thought to be totally modern and
up-to-date and basically finished and
the world completely changed because of
these two little problems that had not
been solved well today we have two
little problems that haven’t been solved
one is called qualia and the other ones
called quanta so qualia refers to inner
experience the sense of awareness and
quanta refers to the quantum measurement
problem namely that somehow the physical
world seems to respond to measurement
some weird way so a lot of physicists
was saying well those are two minor
things that will eventually wrap up I
don’t think so I think when we begin to
understand these two little clouds it
will have as big an impact as the two
clouds that William Thompson was talking
about in 1900 it will totally
revolutionize civilization I really want
to be able to imagine a future in which
we are actively using telepathy to
communicate I mean is this is this
something in the realm of of your
imagination as as well I mean you you
are a scientist and and you’ve kind of
lived this and and this is your career
so well if we are lucky enough to
survive as a species
given the accumulating apocalyptic
scenarios the phases now then eventually
science will catch up to a better
understanding of psychic and mystical
experience as I said just before that
that will cause a very radical change
and our understanding about who we are
our relationship to the universe how it
all works and that sort of thing
if you imagine at this point that we
suddenly have the magic pill and can
make everybody telepathic that would
probably destroy the world pretty
quickly and you can see this in fiction
through stories or movies like Forbidden
Planet that we simply don’t have the
capacity yet to have good control over
our woman’s and desires and our society
and our laws and virtually every piece
of the way that we interact with each
other
assumes privacy and and also assumes
responsibility for your actions
well if you now are living in a hive
mind you know how this is portrayed in
fiction it’s the Borg it’s the invasion
of the Body Snatchers it’s every alien
invasion where you get absorbed into the
into the grand mind this is always
presented as horrific and I think the
reason is that it’s partially an
American thing that we like to imagine
where the the rugged independent cowboy
but the reality is that were already
extremely dependent on each other and
the level of dependency would go up to
such a higher degree that most of the
engine of society would have to change
it would change quickly you can’t have
you can’t have for example a huge
difference or the huge disparity and
people who have an enormous amount
versus people who don’t have an enormous
amount because part of the issue about
becoming telepathic is that you feel
other people’s pain so if you’re a
billionaire and you’re walking past
people who are starving on the streets
that can’t happen
and so of it if that’s going to go away
how does it go away there has to be a
gigantic redistribution of wealth
there’s you can just spin out pretty
pretty quickly
that the way that society is now will
collapse very fast
and that’s dangerous you don’t want
things to collapse
you want them to collapse collapse and
in a graceful way and if slowly in a way
so that it’s under control because
otherwise who knows how it’s gonna build
itself back up and this of course is
another storyline and lots of
science-fiction on the way that
post-apocalyptic societies will rebuild
themselves there are many different ways
of doing that so dart sorry so my hope
is that when when we get closer to
technologies and pharmaceuticals and
other kinds of methods that can enhance
psychic experience because I think we’re
headed in that direction that a lot of
attention is paid to the unintended
consequences of it and so one
possibility is that it will create
secret cabal’s of super psychics who it
which is himself is extremely dangerous
because they could take over the world
pretty quickly and that yet another
science fiction scenario it might if
we’re very lucky and leaders pay
attention to this it could be a way of
slowly introducing these kinds of
concepts and a case can be made without
too much conspiratorial thinking that
one of the reasons that there are movies
about these scenarios is to find a
remind the population that what if we
were able to do this by movies like Lucy
for example or limitless or kind of
pushing in that direction and the reason
why I like both of those pictures is
that although there is a lot of action
in it and so on
they were very different than a lot of
the previous films all of which devolved
very quickly into horror well Lucy
didn’t evolve into horror and nor did
limitless they have much more positive
spin to the story so I’m encouraged to
see that and I know that there are a
number of people in Hollywood who are
interested in the same trend to say no
this is actually part of human potential
and human evolution and there are
positive aspects to it as well dr. Reid
and in
in some of the documentaries like DMT
the spirit molecule I think it was
Dennis McKenna was talking about how
during some of the shamanic experiences
they feel that they talked to various
intelligences or get get pieces of
information and you know you just
mentioned the idea of plant or chemical
substances enhancing psychic ability and
mmm one of the things that’s always I
always wanted to ask dr. McKenna or his
brother is you know if if a person were
to get a piece of information in an
altered state is there any way that that
could be verified I guess that’s kind of
a complicated question but maybe you
could just speak to that or even to the
whole issue of do you feel that any
plant substances can enhance psychic
ability in any real substantive way that
could be measured in the laboratory and
that sort of thing
I’ve spoken to researchers who had
medical schools who are studying
substances like psilocybin and DMT and
they’re very interested in the same
question because they’re subjects
involved in the experiments talk about
it all the time
minimum they talk about telepathy is
just overwhelmingly strong so we’ve
talked about how do you do an experiment
with somebody in these in these states
where we you have the same level of
control as you would if in a laboratory
where you know what chance is and you
get people to do these somewhat
artificial tasks and at this point we
don’t know how to do it because one of
the things that happens in an extreme
altered states of awareness is that
people don’t want to play anymore so I
know from my own experience that if
you’re intoxicated enough depending on
the substance when somebody presents you
with a task now I want you to do this
and this and that and that internally
you’re thinking that’s the stupidest
thing I’ve ever heard of why in the
world would I want to do that I don’t
want to do that now I want to enjoy the
experience so the the closest we’ve come
to thinking about how to do
is to work with participants who have
extensive experience for example with
psilocybin so they know what the
experience is like they are comfortable
with it and they can still do tasks and
so there’s the possibility and still in
the future of doing experiments like a
presentment experiment where they don’t
have to cognitively do anything we’re
just monitoring their body and watching
what happens there’s the possibility
opening for experiments that can be
verified the the difficulty with it is
that because those the drug experiments
are still considered controversial that
just like I don’t want to mix UFOs and
ESP people doing psychedelic research
don’t want to mix it with SCI even
though there’s probably an overlap it’s
simply too too sensitive to do that so
we keep things separate for the sake of
keeping the science clean well we are
certainly covering some very intriguing
material tonight and we are approaching
the end here dr. Aden but I would like
to ask you if you know if there if there
was anything and you’ve been doing this
for a while and you have you’ve learned
a lot and you know is there anything
that you would tell your younger self to
be aware of or anything that you would
go back and kind of tell yourself yeah I
would tell myself in graduate school to
take courses in the sociology of science
and probably the philosophy of science
as well because it was a rude awakening
for me after had gotten into this field
and was working at it for a while to see
that the aspiration of science as a
rational Enterprise is simply not true
academic freedom isn’t true the idea
that scientists will evaluate data
rationally is not true all of those
stories that we hear about the way that
science is different from religion is
different from politics and all that
it’s simply not true science is another
human activity and it has the same
frailties as every every other kind of
active
the only thing that science has going
for it is that there’s very strong
emphasis on rigorous methods and
consensus opinion so those are good
unfortunately consensus opinion is also
an enormous ly efficient block for
things that don’t happen to fit to
prevailing viewpoints so for many
respects it’s amazing that science has
done as well as it has and unfortunately
as science becomes more and more of a
career rather than a matter of
expressing your curiosity people find it
more and more constraints about what
they talk about and what I mean by this
is I’m kind of a lightning rod for
scientists who are interested in this
topic so I get a lot of phone calls and
emails from professor’s all over the
place who are just anxious to tell me
about their interests and psychic
phenomena and sometimes their
experiences and then the end of every
conversation is the same don’t tell
anybody
did I spoke to you don’t tell anybody
that I did this experiment and I haven’t
published it and I’m not going to and
publish it even though it turned out
good because there is a taboo the taboo
is you don’t
it’s like Fight Club first rule is you
don’t talk about it second rule in the
third rule they’re all the same rule
don’t talk about this because it’s
damaging or you’re standing in your
career so I would warn myself as a
fledgling scientist to simply be aware
that it carries a certain amount of risk
whenever you you start pushing against
the prevailing viewpoint and I don’t
think I would have done anything
different because I guess I’m enough of
an iconoclast that I don’t care very
much about what other people think but I
have just been astonished really to see
firsthand cases of people who in any
other condition you’d consider to be
very smart very accommodating very
tolerant and completely insane when it
comes to topics like this you know dr.
Reid and I can totally understand your
frustration as a scientist I got a
little bit bored doing molecular biology
experiments and I’m off on a different
direction right now I think that
curiosity you mentioned is so key
I mean you mentioned moving on from
wondering if sigh effects are real and
now wondering how their work how they
actually work and I think that is so so
true I mean I can’t think of any other
question more fascinating at this time
in history then how are these effects
working you know it’s they cannot be
blocked by a Faraday cage they I think
there was an experiment where they’re
not blocked at the bottom of the ocean
you know and it’s just totally amazing
so I think your work is really it’s
really cool and so what encourages me
about all this is that if you were to
segregate scientists by their age the
younger the scientist is the more open
they are about their interest and the
more willing they are to come out of the
closet so to speak
that’s a very encouraging sign and this
essentially is how science has
progressed that the you know science
progresses by funerals as Max Planck
said and in this case the evidence
continues to compound the empirical
evidence keeps compounding and gets
better and better with time eventually
with when people find better and better
ways of presenting the evidence even
with explanations that are not
completely correct but sound plausible
that we don’t longer have to deal with
the baggage of older scientists because
they’re going to go away eventually and
younger scientists of course that are
immediately going to be attracted to
these topics so the older I get the more
important it is for what I can offer at
this point is to write papers and books
mainly targeting younger scientists and
when we can tell for example when we
publish a paper and a site like
frontiers we get tens of thousands of
downloads well we don’t know what ages
are doing the downloading but just
statistically a lot of more young people
are living on the Internet and older
people so it’s a it’s a good bet that a
lot of the interest is from younger
folks and that’s that’s very encouraging
well doctor reading you are one of the
men who stared photons apparently and I
really do appreciate your time sir me
should you do you have anything
on closing here with our guest yeah I
have one small question doctor reading
you’ve done these experiments where
people effect random number generators
just real quick if is there an effect
where if 10 people are folks focusing
their attention or 100 people are
focusing their attention it’ll be
different than one person trying to show
something in a laboratory well
unfortunately we’re not dealing with the
linear effect the the the best metaphor
I can think of is something like a soap
bubble that if you you have a one person
who is trying to balance a soap bubble
they can do a certain degree and if you
have two people helping that doesn’t
necessarily help because they may not be
handling it in the same way and you can
burst it if you have 10 people all
trying to do it at the same time it
could burst real fast so the important
ingredient that seems to help is
coherence among people and that does
occur occasionally
when it occurs people know it instantly
there’s some kind of they’re in the zone
they feel something gel in the crowd but
it’s relatively rare it’s very difficult
to actually produce on demand but when
that happens experiments like field
consciousness experiments do show that
randomness begins to respond very
quickly it goes it basically starts to
become patterned so that so it’s not a
it’s a nonlinear effect and the moment
you get into non-linearity it’s a much
more complicated answer than simply ten
is better than one hmm Wow
very powerful episode here dr. Aden
where can people find your work what is
what is the next step for you well two
sites one is noetic org which is the
Institute of noetic Sciences website my
own website is Dean Radin comm the sites
for testing your abilities include got
cyborg and cyber Cade comm together
they’ve collected a half a billion
trials from about a half a million
people and we’re in the in the midst of
creating a smartphone version of those
tests that we call psych you which is an
by analogy to IQ we’re attempting
to establish population norms for
different kinds of psychic ability that
people can carry around on their cell
phones this is the human experience my
name is Xavier just want to thank my
guest and Misha thank you we are gonna
get out of here we will see you guys
next week
